Thursday, May 27, 2010

Lab approved for testing waterproof membranes for City of LA

Passing it on...

25 May 2010 - Precision Geosynthetic Laboratories International (PGLI) has been approved by the City of Los Angeles for the testing of Waterproofing Membranes and Methane Barriers. They are the first and only laboratory approved for Waterproofing Membranes and Methane Barrier. Their Test Agency permit number is TA 24784. They are capable of performing all of the tests required by the Los Angeles Department of Building Services for both Waterproofing Membranes and Methane Barriers.
PGLI is headquartered in Irvine, CA and has testing facilities to serve their clients all around the US and abroad in China. In 2009, PGLI was the first international company to be certified by the China Meterology Accredidation (CMA).
Please do not hesitate to contact PGLI with any questions regarding CMA testing or testing of materials for your business or product. Precision Geosynthetics Laboratory International is an independent testing company specializing in Manufacturing Quality Assurance (MQA)-Inspection and Sampling, Manufacturing Quality Control Testing, a full range of Geosynthetic Testing Services, Test Training, consulting, and specification reviews with laboratories operating in California, Texas, Georgia, and China.
For more information and a complete list of tests please visit PGLI's web site www.precisionlabs.net or contact Ronald Belanger, president of PGLI, directly at rbelanger@precisionlabs.net.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

CSLB Revokes BAY AREA WATERPROOFING AND PAINTING's License

Sebastopol based Bay Area Waterproofing and Painting's contractors license (539103) was revoked by the CSLB for failure to comply with an arbitration award, according to the information available at CSLB's website.

Always check your contractors license at CSLB before contracting, making a deposit or allowing them to begin work. Click here to see the information on Bay Area Waterproofing and Painting's license

Arbitration Violation Disclosure

License Number: 539013
Contractor Name: BAY AREA WATERPROOFING AND PAINTING
Arbitration #: A N 2008 000242
Date: 05/30/2009
Status: COMPLIED AFTER REVOCATION
Code Violation Description
Business & Professions Code 7085.6 Failed to comply with arbitration award 

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Sale on from CID Registry of California

Passing it on...any vendors who might be interested?


****NEW & IMPROVED***



2010 CID Registry of California™



(Data as of 12/31/2009)







Now - only the "good stuff" at the same low price!







We have filtered out all listings that are older than three (3) years back from 12/31/2009.







20% off ends July 20,2010!







How much is one new client worth?

The cleanest and most up-to-date info available. Management company moved or merged... we have it updated!





• We have 31,700+ CIDs (HOAs, Condos, PUDs....) available by individual county on CD [active & suspended with FILEDATES after 12/31/2007 (3 years)].





• Common Interest Developements (CIDs - HOAs, CONDOs, PUDs...) are corporations and are required to file every two (2) years. That means CIDs that filed in 2009 will not be updated until sometime in 2011. Once submitted to the state, it usually takes a few months to actually get updated. So, that data is still pretty good!
• Never used the CID Registry of California™ CID/HOA databases to support your business development - here’s your chance!
The CID Registry of California™ databases contain contact information for approximately 31,900+ Community Associations (HOAs, Townhouse, Condos, PUDs, etc.) These associations are located throughout California's 58 counties (48 counties in Northern California and 10 in Southern California).
Discounted Packages:
# OF COUNTIES/REGIONS
NORMAL COST
SAVE
20% OFF YOUR PRICE
ONE
$250.00
$50.00
$200.00
TWO
$425.00
$85.00
$340.00
THREE
$575.00
$115.00
$460.00
FOUR
$700.00
$140.00
$560.00
FIVE
$800.00
$160.00
$640.00
NO CALIF
$950.00
$220.00
$760.00
SO CALIF
$1,100.00
$190.00
$880.00
ENTIRE STATE
$1,800.00
$360.00
$1,440.00
Add 8.75% CA sales tax for orders shipped to a California addressNo renting and no time limit on use
Provided on Compact Disc (CD) in ASCII text (.txt) and MS Excel (.xls) formats

• Provided in both ASCII- Comma Delimited Text (.txt) and Excel (.xls) formats & directions to import into MS Access.

• Agent, Mailing & President contact info. Management companies and developers identified! Last FILEDATE provided.

• Don’t miss this opportunity!
Go to: www.cidregistry.com - for more info
or
click here to order on line.
"The Ability To Effectively Market Your Product or
Service Is The Life Blood Of Your Business."
Order today – your competitor already has!

Need other states - Arizona, Hawaii, Neveda or Oregon got to www.cid-data.com

Are you listed on CondoBiz? Is your listing up-to-date? Go to www.condobiz.com and see!

Need a new web site or update existing web site www.blkbird.com

If you wish to be removed from our e-mail list please select mpanda1@san.rr.com and type “REMOVE “ in the subject line.
P.O. Box 12584 La Jolla CA 92039 or call 800.350.8333 for more info

Bay Area Roofing/Waterproofing Contractor Louis and Riparetti's Contractors License Revoked for Multiple Offenses

Got my CSLB newsletter today...in it are all the licensees whose licenses have been REVOKED...
one of the biggest firms in the Bay Area, Louis & Riparetti's license (760630) has been revoked.

This is at CSLB's website as of today...click here to see for yourself

Case Violation Disclosure

License Number: 760630
Contractor Name: LOUIS AND RIPARETTI INC
Case #: N 2007 000334
Date: 09/30/2009
Status: LICENSE REVOKED
Number of Complaints: 1
Code Violation Description
Business & Professions Code 7109 Departure from trade standards, plans or specs 
Business & Professions Code 7113 Exceeded contract amount 
Business & Professions Code 7097 Other license was suspended 
Business & Professions Code 7121 Associated with disciplined licensee 
Business & Professions Code 7121.5 Qualifier prohibited against association 

AGC University (Oregon-Columbia Chapter) Offers "Deconstructing A Construction Defect Claim" Course

Hey if you are up in Washington?oregon and want to see how a construction defect case is deconstructed, then this course is for you.

See below...click here to go to their page

This course provides a general overview of a claim for construction defect based on water intrusion. It will explain legal issues that are typically a focus of these types of claims. It specifically looks at a variety of contract provisions that may affect the outcome of these types of claims.
***This course is intended to inform participants on matters of current interest in the legal industry. It is not intended as legal advice. Participants should not act upon the information contained in this course without seeking professional counsel.
Learning Outcomes:
􀂃
What claims are typically made in a construction defect claim based on water intrusion
􀂃
How these claims are handled by the court
􀂃
What factual and legal issues typically arise in these claims
􀂃
How Oregon courts have dealt with similar factual and legal issues
Presenters:
􀂃
Anne Cohen, Attorney, Smith Freed & Eberhard

Why and How Did This Deck Fail Prematurely? Deck Expert Autopsies a Dead Deck

As an estimator selling deck coatings for new home construction, I always had a hard time getting the  job. The short simple reply to my question "Why didn't I get this job?' was usually "Your quote is  to much compared to X." Of course it wasn't an apples to apples type bid. My competitors all use different materials than I, many of which are not as detailed and have as many steps to install as Desert Crete is. Fewer steps to install means less labor, and that means a lower cost. The contractor doesn't care, he's thinking profits ahead of great waterproofing.
I never sold on rock bottom pricing and I still don't, even in this economy. Cheap waterproofing is cheap waterproofing. Period. I provide high quality and high end service with high end waterproofing products backing me up. I have very few go backs and a near zero warranty claims record because of this.
Anyway, I get this repair job over in Shell Beach;  a roof top deck. I go look at it, and as soon as I walked in the house, I knew I'd been here before some years ago when it was being built.
My inspection finds a few cracks at flashing edges that need repairs as well as a larger/longer cracks in the field of the deck and the surface needs to be cleaned and resealed. At least, that's what we think... Well we started yesterday with demo'ing some of the decking. I could not believe what we found!
This job has defect written all over it...
The cracks were opened and we found the deck was not stapled down as it should be-these metal lath based systems usually require typically 20+ staples per square foot. So we found DEFECT # 1. Stapling of lath not done as directed in the ICC report and the manufacturer's installation instructions. The pictures clearly show that there's maybe 7/8 per square foot. The decking came up fairly easily and it shouldn't have, but that's what happens when your deck is done wrong.Strangely enough, the deck material just peeled right up, not sticking to anything...
 
Then we found a membrane applied to the deck substrate. It''s an asphalt based membrane. Looking closer at this membrane, I note that it's very shiny. Run your finger over it and it's smooth & waxy feeling. I look at it again; I realize that the shiny stuff is a film. I get a fingernail under a piece, I peel it back. Underneath is the membrane and it feels smooth to, but not waxy. I call a manufacturer that I know makes this decking product. Technical service says oh yes, that film has to be removed before stapling lath down. It's on to protect the membrane up until it's ready to be covered. Ohhh, that's why the deck material peeled off so easily. When I staple my lath/put down our cement, it's stuck! Usually the only efficient way to get it off is to just saw off all the plywood!
So DEFECT #2 is not taking off the protective film, which prevented proper adhesion to the membrane.

Defect 3 may be in play if the plans/specs for the house call for a Class A/One Hour Fire Rating. The assembly described is not an approved method under the ICC report of the two manufacturer's who make this type of product. Building codes typically call for Class A/One Hour roofs as they are very vulnerable to fire. Class A rated assemblies resist fire.
Peeling back the decking, we get to the edges where the flashing's are under the coating, meeting the deck/wall and allowing the decking to terminate. The flashing's are found to be nailed off in a manner that is not consistent with code requirements and the manufacturer's instructions. We are supposed to nail flashing's so they lay flat without distortion or movement, in a W pattern. This was not done as required. So we have DEFECT # 4. Looking again at the flashing's, I see they are bright shiny metal-the coating peels off easily from the flashing.
 This is because the installer did not wipe down his flashing's with a solvent to remove film oils that bright flashing's have on them. So we have Defect #5.

And the final Defect, Defect #6, is the drains, or more precisely, the lack of. We have 6 pipes stubbed up through the floor of the deck, but where are the drains? We use Thunderbird Products drains, a flat plate allows us to terminate the coating and run the waterproofing into the drain pipe. Not here...no drain, just use caulk and say a prayer...

This job was doomed to fail from the day it was put down...a big thank you to my competitor for the work! Keep up the bad work!