Showing posts with label Condo Maintenance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Condo Maintenance. Show all posts

Monday, October 6, 2014

We Contributed our Experiences on Exterior Building Maintenance for New England Condominium Magazine

Our latest contribution to maintenance of condo's appears in the March issue of New England Condominium. 

Staying Ahead of Trouble

Building Exteriors Need Regular Checkups, Too

By Lisa Iannucci

Remember the old jingle, ‘it takes a licking and keeps on ticking’? It was the famous tagline from the Timex watch advertisements. The gist of the ad is that no matter what you threw at it, a Timex watch kept working.
If you think about it, a building’s exterior is almost like a Timex watch. Each year, Mother Nature throws its best curveballs – intense sun, high winds, fierce rains, heavy loads of snow and ice, and frigid temperatures – at the outside of your condo buildings. Don’t forget the pollution, dirt from such animals as pigeons and, of course, any items that accidentally hit the exterior. The exterior continues to stand and takes it all in. Well, almost. A building’s exterior can take a lot of abuse, but after time, it does begin to show wear and tear and needs some TLC.
Read the whole article by clicking here. 
http://newenglandcondo.com/articles/718/1/Staying-Ahead-of-Trouble/Page1.html

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Florida Condo Owner Asks About Roof Repairs....

From Florida's News Press a reader wants to know about roof repairs...

Vote of owners isn't required for roof repair

Association also can levy assessments

Joe Adams • special to news-press.com • November 21, 2010
Q: I am a unit owner in a condominium. Our board of directors is considering a proposal to replace the roofs on all of the condominium buildings at a total cost of $250,000. The board also intends to levy a special assessment to pay a portion of the cost. In my opinion, some of the roofs are in good shape, and not all of the roofs need to be replaced. Does the board have the authority to do this without a vote of the owners? L.T. (via e-mail)
A: In accordance with Section 718.113(1), Florida Statutes, maintenance of the common elements is the responsibility of the association. The management and operation of the association is by its board of directors, and the actions of the board do not require approval from the owners unless such approval is required by law or by the governing documents. As an example, if the proposal was to change the roof in a way that would constitute a material alteration or substantial addition to the common elements, then such a change would require approval by the unit owners in accordance with the declaration, or by 75 percent of the unit owners if the declaration is silent. Under your facts, it does not sound like a material alteration or substantial addition is being proposed. Therefore,  READ THE REST BY CLICKING HERE

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

ReBlog From HOA Constitutional Government-HOA Maintenance

Saw this on a blog, thought you could use the info....


Understanding deference to HOA boards and overturning bad precedents

A recent California case, Affan v. Portofino Cove HOA, highlights several important aspects of legal precedent and the judicial deference doctrine that all advocates must understand. First, in California, as applied to maintenance decisions only, the court in Lamden v. La Jolla made a reasonable clarification of the business judgment rule and established the “judicial deference” doctrine.
This court ruled:
It is important to note the narrow scope of the Lamden rule. It is a rule of deference to the reasoned decisionmaking of homeowners association boards concerning ordinary maintenance. It does not create a blanket immunity for all the decisions and actions of a homeowners association. The Supreme Court’s precise articulation of the rule makes clear that the rule of deference applies only when a homeowner sues an association over a maintenance decision that meets the enumerated criteria.

Monday, August 18, 2008

San Diego Union Tribune Has Article on the True Costs of Deferred Maintenance on HOA's






Postponed repair work catching up with condos
by Laurie Weisberg
Dilapidated stairways, rickety decks, leaky roofs, moldy walls and corroded sewer pipes. These are the sort of structural headaches confronting scores of homeowner associations as costly repairs to older complexes drain their communal treasuries.


After years of deferred maintenance, compounded by tightfisted members' unwillingness to pay higher monthly fees, condominium associations are facing a looming financial crisis, condo experts say.

“In order to maintain the assets, you have to have long-term thinking, but what we've seen is short-term people not planning for long-term futures,” said Karen Conlon, president of the California Association of Community Managers.

When repeated Band-Aid fixes no longer suffice, condominium owners find themselves on the hook for hefty special assessments, sometimes in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Increasingly, homeowner groups are having to take out loans to soften the blow of high levies.

“Deferred and unfunded maintenance is a ticking time bomb because so many homeowner associations are unprepared for it,” longtime condo attorney Erik Basil said. “What sometimes happens is association members don't want to contemplate having to write a $1,000 or $5,000 check, so they pretend there's nothing wrong, and that's what has occurred for the last 10 years.”

The problems associated with stalled repairs have worried Conlon's association for some time and are being complicated by the slide in home values and the credit meltdown.


Read the rest of the Story by Clicking Here

Here's my comments/opinion...
As if we didn't already know this...condo's suffer from a lack of funding for their reserve accounts for replacement and repairs to the common area's-roofs, painting, wood replacement, DECKS, asphalt etc. Wow what a surprise! Boards refuse to fund their reserve accounts, because they don't want to raise dues...and that's why they ran, so that dues won't go up! Well guess what...costs rise over time, and Boards refuse to maintain properly, allowing components to degrade so that they now need to be replaced.

Replacement of components is not cheaper than simply maintaining them to achieve their maximum life span. Consider...a typical 10' x 8' deck, all of 80 square feet, when properly built and waterproofed, with normal maintenance every 3 years, would cost around $3.00 per square foot to power wash, maybe make a few small repairs, and then apply a new top coat of pigmented sealer to continue protecting the waterproofing from UV degradation. That's $240.00 total for maintenance. Over a 36 month period, that comes out to about $6.67 per month that should be saved in reserves for the future maintenance that the Board/Manager/Association knows needs to be done to that deck and every other deck in the complex.
So $240.00 every 3 years (we're not adjusting for inflation in this example, but a reserve study provider would) means the deck would be resealed 10 times over the 30 year lifespan. That's $2,400.00 in today's dollars for maintenance.

Now take a deck the same size, leave it out in the sun exposed to UV for 5-10 years, don't maintain it, don't inspect it, just keep your head in the sand...and when you pull your head out of the sand, voila, one degraded, rotted deck is ready for replacement!

What does that cost? Well in my experience it comes out like this...demo old deck and framing, rebuild deck framing as required, apply new plywood to deck, re-stucco or install new siding, about $5,000. Then add the deck guy's work-new flashing,new deck coatings, whatever else might be needed-drains/scuppers etc. Add around $1200 or so for this work... TOTAL REPLACEMENT COSTS each deck-$6,200.00. Giving the benefit of doubt, we'll take the deck out to 10 years before it's being replaced...that's a total of $51.67 per month pro-rated over 120 months.

Seems it's cheaper to maintain...but that's just my opinion...