Thursday, July 8, 2010

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Definition of "Retention"

Yassin v. Solis, 184 Cal. App. 4th 524 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)

By: Carlo L. Rodes and Brett D. Bissett, K&L Gates, Los Angeles

In this case, the court of appeal set forth a definition for retention that applies whenever a contractor seeks an award of penalties for improperly withheld retention under a California prompt payment statute.

The plaintiff-contractor, Diaa Yassin was hired by the defendants-owners, (collectively “Solises”), to improve the Solises’ home. Under the contract, Yassin was to receive a series of payments throughout various stages of construction and the last payment was to be made upon completion of the work and before occupancy. Yassin ultimately sued the Solises for money allegedly owed under the contract. Although the court addressed other matters, a principal issue was the status of the final two payments of $15,000 and whether those amounts qualified as retention payments under California Civil Code § 3260. Under section 3260, if an owner fails to make retention payments within the time prescribed by that section, a contractor may recover a penalty in the amount of 2 percent per month on the improperly withheld amount plus attorney fees.

The trial court awarded the Solises $50,000 in damages and $36,205.14 in attorney fees pursuant to section 3260(g). The trial court reasoned that because the final payment was not due until the certificate of occupancy was issued, the final payment was retention because the amount was withheld until the work was completed and approved.

On appeal, the court overruled the Solises’ fee award on the ground that the last payment did not constitute a retention and, thus, Civil Code Section 3260(g) was inapplicable. The court interpreted a retention to be funds withheld from payment, and not the payment itself. Specifically, the court held that a retention has to be an amount that, by contract, has been retained from an amount owing for work already done, but not presently paid, rather than an unpaid sum or last payment due upon completion. According to the court, the contract at issue did not include retention terms, which are generally a percentage of each progress payment.

The court noted the prior case of Murray’s Iron Works, Inc. v. Boyce, which held that a down payment and final payment are not progress payments under section 3260.1. Murray’s, 71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 317, 330-31 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). The Yassin court explained, however, that this does not mean that “a final payment due at the conclusion of performance under an installment contract is a retention. It is simply the last installment.” Yassin, 184 Cal. App. 4th at 537.

The Yassin court concluded that section “3260.1 imposes a penalty for the wrongful withholding of a progress payment, [and] it makes sense that § 3260 imposes a penalty on the wrongful withholding of amounts retained from progress payments—i.e. the retention. The remedy [here] for the failure to pay a last installment payment upon completion of services is simply damages for a breach of contract.” Id. The court, consequently, held that the Solises were not entitled to attorney fees under section 3260(g) for improperly withheld retention.

Call For Entries-Concrete Construction

Concrete Construction DOY 2010 Call for Entries
Image 1 Image 2
Decorative Concrete Project of the Year
TO ENTER
Entry forms are available at concreteconstruction.net.

DEADLINE
August 27, 2010

QUESTIONS
Ask Colette Palait
cpalait@hanleywood.com
773.824.2506

PRODUCED BY
Concrete Construction

2010 CALL FOR ENTRIES

Enter CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION's 6th Decorative Concrete Project of the Year Contest. A look at the best projects, design and techniques of commercial decorative concrete.
WHY ENTER?
Get great exposure for your company. Winners will be featured this fall in a special section of CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION and all entries on concreteconstruction.net.
ENTRY ELIGIBILITY
Concrete contractors, general contractors, architects, decorative concrete specialists and other professionals may enter commercial and public projects completed prior to
July 1, 2010.

MATERIALS
Send a high-res image and fill out the form found online at concreteconstruction.net.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Decorative Concrete Council Seeks Entries for Concrete Projects

Win Best of Show!
Colorado Hardscapes

The Decorative Concrete Council, a specialty council of the American Society of Concrete Contractors, is seeking entries for its 2011 awards program, which recognizes outstanding decorative concrete projects in 11 different categories, with one project taking home the coveted Best of Show honor. Download this PDF for complete contest rules.

Monday, July 5, 2010

Quest Building Products Has a Big Sale Going...



I got their flyer in the mail, they have Mapei products, Platinum Epoxy products and Sika at 50% off. Restrictions apply. See their new website at www.questbuilding.com today!

Tell them ya saw it here!

APRA's Newsletter is Up

From our friends at APRA

Association of Professional Reserve Analysts (APRA) is the national trade association for those that carry the prestigious Professional Reserve Analyst (PRA) credential.   APRA provides a common base of knowledge, standards of care and professionalism.  Membership is open to reserve study providers and those that provide related services.   For membership information and the latest APRA Advisor, go to www.apra-usa.com
IN THIS EDITION
Slow Economy Planning.  Prioritizing renovation events.
Budgeting Tips.  Get ahead of the budget season.
Contractor or Employee?  Be sure you hire who you think you’re hiring.

ADVERTISERS
APRA Advisor is distributed to over 10,000 HOA board members and managers throughout the country.  For advertiser information, email APRA@teamwi.com
Richard Thompson  PRA
President - Association of Professional Reserve Advisors

The Regenesis Report (National Edition) July 2010 is now available

From our friends at Regenesis.net
 

The Regenesis Report (National Edition) July 2010 is now available for viewing at www.Regenesis.net

IN THIS EDITION
Managing Solo. Is your HOA cut out to go it alone?
Ask the HOA Expert™.  Another set of intriguing Q&As.
How to Deal with a Crazy Board.  Tips for getting your point across.
Committee Charters.  Every committee needs marching orders.
Collection Policy Scorecard.  Does your Policy have what it takes to bring home the bacon?
Pool Considerations.  Tune up your pool operation.
The Coach Speaks.  Never mistake activity for achievement.
Bob’s Rules of Disorder.  How to bring your meetings to a grinding halt.
ADVERTISERS  The Regenesis Report reaches over 10,000 homeowner association boards and managers nationwide each month.
For advertiser information, see www.regenesis.net/advertise.htm
SELF MANAGED HOA? Regenesis.net is specifically designed to assist self managed HOAs with management issues. 
Besides the personalized Ask the HOA Expert™
 service, there is a vast number of self-help resources. 
All for only $99/year.  For details, see www.Regenesis.net/SubscriberInformation.htm
 
Why not share The Regenesis Report with someone you love?
~RLT Signature.bmp
Richard L. Thompson

The HOA Expert
www.Regenesis.net